Muraho mwese! Another month has passed,
and it's time for another installment in this long series of posts on
Rwanda. This month's post, once again courtesy of Nannie, is about
land ownership in Rwanda.
As I learned in my semester of ECON 101
in college, clearly defined land ownership is a very important thing
for an economy, lending it stability and encouraging investment.
Clear ownership laws lead, not surprisingly, to a sense of ownership,
which in turn encourages those owners to care for their land and add
value to it because they may one day want to sell it and would
probably appreciate getting more money for it than they originally
paid. Clear regulation of land ownership eliminates the effect known
as “tragedy of the commons,” which happens when everyone is
responsible for something yet no one takes responsibility for it, as
can sometimes be seen with public parks, for example. But, enough
about basic Economics; this is about Rwanda, and Rwanda is taking
action to more clearly define land ownership. The government aims to
make clear land boundaries, map out all land, and issue land titles
to all landowners by 2013. In this post, I'll explore who owns the
land in Rwanda and what options there are for gaining access to land.
In 2005, the Organic Land Law was
enacted in Rwanda. This law outlines Rwanda's policies concerning land
ownership, and it has been widely heralded as a great example to
other African countries in the way it establishes clear guidelines
for land ownership and encourages investment. According to the law,
all land in Rwanda officially belongs to the government. The
government then leases land to individuals or businesses for a period
of 50 to 99 years. I found this interesting, but it appears not to be
uncommon, at least in Africa, and if you click here
post you'll find an article comparing land ownership in Rwanda and
Kenya, which has a similar situation. When I asked my roommates about
land ownership, the thing that they mentioned about government
ownership of land is that the government has the right to, say, build
a road through someone's land without compensating him/her for it.
The only thing the government has to compensate someone for is
his/her house or other personal property that may be demolished to
make way for the new road. I did not find how that is dealt with in
the lease with the government, and I have a feeling there's some part
of that story missing.
One of the reasons this law is viewed
so positively, especially concerning the encouragement of investment,
is that there is no difference between Rwandan nationals and
foreigners. So, if I want a piece of land in Rwanda, it's just as
easy for me as for my Rwandan neighbor, and I don't have to worry
about him getting preferential treatment at the land registrar's
office. Since my small piggy bank doesn't really interest the
government, its true importance is that foreign investors can easily
obtain land and (hopefully) boost the economy with their businesses.
To obtain land, first a person must get
documents related to the land such as the previous title deed and the
sale/purchase agreement, for which there are land registration
offices in each of the four provinces in Rwanda. Then, with those
documents, an ID, and the receipt from paying the land lease and
transfer fees, he/she goes to the district office (there are 30
districts in Rwanda) to complete the lease. The figure I saw for the
fees was around 100,000 RWF (about $160), but I imagine it must vary
according to the size and value of the land.
Once land is obtained for this
long-term lease, it may be passed down as an inheritance, with equal
rights given to both men and women in the law. Again, this
stipulation of equal rights to land for wwwmen and women is trumpeted by
many, but the realities on the ground do not always reflect the law,
as this article
suggests. Besides inheritance, I'm unsure about the renewal of a
lease, but it must be possible, and I suspect that it would be easier
than first obtaining the land.
Rwanda's economy still relies heavily
on agriculture, but not all Rwandans have enough land to cultivate
all that they want: one statistic I found said that 24% of the
population controls 70% of the arable land. So the question becomes
how is access granted to those who need land to work but don't
actually hold a lease themselves. There are several possibilities
from what I have seen. First of all, there are numerous cooperatives
around Rwanda where farmers can pay dues to have access to a small
plot. In the valley below my house there is a small cooperative, and
people plant various vegetables on their plots of land.
The other option is to work on land
owned by a large company who then compensates the farmers for their
harvest. For example, in my area much of the land in the valleys is
owned by Gikonko Rice, a large rice factory nearby. The farmers don't
own what they grow, but they have work and make money on what they
sell to the factory. I found this out when one of my students came to
me once to ask about getting money. The solution I proposed was that
I could buy whatever it was that his mother grew, since I knew she
was a farmer. He told me she farms the rice fields and can't sell her
rice to me. So much for that idea.
To make a long story short, no Rwandans
technically own land, but they can effectively do so through
long-term leases from the government. Those who can't afford the
leases or can't find land, can join a cooperative or work land owned
by a large company. As with many things, the Rwandan government is
working to improve land ownership regulation with increased focus on
land registration. In fact, there are many billboards around urging
people to register their land.
Hopefully you've learned something in
this post. Until next month, murabeho!
Happy birthday this month: Nannie,
Derek, Seth, Aunt Beth, Abby, John
Next month's post: Guest writer?

Interesting. That's a good deal for land, but it would be interesting to see how many people would be interested in paying more money for ownership.
ReplyDeleteI was watching the Olympic trials and remembered you were out of the country, so that's why someone else won the steeple chase.